Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Yes, but that's not applying federal law. Dumbass. It's like the Defense of Marriage Act.
And if you were at all up on things, you would know that now "Erie" is about retiree medical and age discrimination.
|
Exactly, you fucking moron. Tenancy by entireties is STATE LAW. Some states have it, some states don't. Some states allow for partition, some don't.
And we were never limited to merely discussing Federal law here. You were forced to argue in that context becuase the cite you provided was irrelevant to my point.
My point, in case you haven't forgot, is that no ordinary (not fed tax lien holding) judgment creditor is going to punch through a tenancy by entireties. You've cited nothing to the contrary expect a wholly inapplicable case involving exclusively tax liens. To suggest that you reasonably assumed that in my initial statement where I said I was judgment proof, I was referring to Federal tax liens would strain credulity. You brought a tax lien argument to a standard judgment creditor v. tenancy by entireties argument. That sort of argument, my dear, is alawys politely dimissed as "misplaced."
Oh, and by the way, honey, I've used t by e with success against fed forfeiture claims, so I'm not even certain your original hypothesis holds any fucking water. Stay in the library and leave the arguments to those who've actually made them before.
