LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,452
0 members and 2,452 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 02:04 PM.
View Single Post
Old 04-21-2008, 03:45 PM   #14
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Quote:
Originally posted by Adder
Maybe McCain thinks that the oil companies will use the extra revenue to increase refining capacity? (yeah, right)
The economics above is faulty. If supply were fixed then price would continue up ad infinitum. It doesn't because there are marginal imports of gasoline that meet increased demand. The tax incidence depends on the elasticities of demand and supply--no tax would increase revenues for oil cos. and decrease prices for ocnsumers.

As for increasing refining capacity, they would if environmental laws and community opposition didn't prevent it. They have every economic incentive to increase refining capacity, but can't because of various restrictions.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM.