LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 89
0 members and 89 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-21-2008, 05:13 PM   #20
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
It's equally easy to envision it the other way around. Basic economics teaches that the incidence of a tax falls more upon the seller/buyer whose supply/demand is more inelastic. If consumer demand is inelastic, but has some elasticity (which even in the short run it does), whereas refiners have no elasticity of supply because of capacity constraints, then they will bear the full amount of the tax.
What you're saying here doesn't make sense to me, though perhaps the failure is mine. Assume that producers cannot substantially increase production beyond current levels. If the taxes were to disappear tomorrow, why would they not pocket that margin and leave their prices the same? If they have limited ability to bring refined gasoline in from other countries, then maybe that affects the price a little on the margin, but there can't be much capacity there.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM.