|
Re: It was the wrong thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
He did lose his $105,000 a year job. And the Chungs incurred no costs, having raised the costs of the first trial through fundraising, and being represented pro bono on the appeal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Chung |
Not good enough. Intentional infliction of emotional distress, yes? Pain and suffering of the Chungs?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me
|
