Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I guess I view it a little bit differently*. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought commercial speech was treated differently and here, people or companies engaged in commercial speech would be treated the same. Is it not permissible to distinguish on these grounds? If so, aren't we really saying that they are free to their commercial speech, so long as that speech adheres to the place/manner (i.e., you can't market via phone to those that have requested you don't) restrictions imposed?
*Disclosure: My actually Con Law knowledge is limited
|
In that case, you're not saying that this is just a time/place/manner restriction, you're saying that it's OK to discriminate against these calls because they're commercial speech.
I'm not sure what I think of this, although I suspect the Tenth Circuit got it right. Presumably the distinction you're emphasizing doesn't hit so close to home for Watchtower, either.
