Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
If you were truly concerned about bias, you wouldn't be relying on a letter from David Kay, whose interest in pleasing the Administration has been clear. Like so many conservative complaints about bias in the media, what you are after is an excuse to ignore bad news.
|
not bias. flat out fabrication. distain for facts, thank you.
help me Ty. the WP was quoting him and all, or quoting guys who supposedly reported to him, but they weren't. or is your point, its okay that they fabricated, or were, at best, grossly negligent, because what WP reported was sort of correct if you accept that what it says is true? you know, he lied but it is okay because he didn't need to.
I wasn't clear before maybe. here's your challenge: explain the second letter, you know from the Aussi guy who was directly quoted. I want to still believe in the press. Help me understand how I can, please?
