Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
you argued the article shows he switched. I point out he didn't switch and what the article says he said is consistant with what he did. then you say what the article said was so vague as to be a truism. Well okay, but its your article to support your point which means you're the one without any support. right?
confidential to ty
are there 2 of you that alternate?
|
Characterizing two conflicting policies as both being "in national interest" or whatever is NOT evidence that he hasn't changed his stance. It's evidence that he's using the same characterization for two totally different stances.
2000: I will paint my bedroom pink because it is the best color ever and no other color will do!
2002: I will paint my bedroom green because it is the best color ever and no other color will do!
You, defending me: In both cases she said it's the best color ever, so she's always going with the best color ever, so how can you say her stance changed?
And your avatar is way, way ugly.
Edited to change "moniker" to "avatar," though the moniker is not inspired either.
