LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-25-2013, 09:18 AM   #2887
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: It was the wrong thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch View Post
Scenario:

A woman approached the podium and began reading her letter in opposition to an item. Amongst her objections was the fact that the applicant lacked a necessary state license to engage in the business it proposed to conduct. Her letter made much of the fact that she was both a neighbor and a California attorney, and ended ominously with the threat that any approval of the project was "the tip of the legal iceberg" since the decision makers would all be sued (naturally) if they were so foolhardy as to proceed despite her dire and well-founded warning.

As she spoke I checked the state bar website and determined that this "California attorney" has been on inactive status since July for failure to pay bar dues.

I don't typically interject to correct errors of fact or law by public speakers because to do so would mean there would never be time left for the second speaker. But do I have a duty to send a copy of the letter to the state bar? I don't really give a shit, but if others think there's a professional duty implicated I would respect that.

Potentially relevant is that based on her address she's rich as fuuuuuuuuck and could definitely buy me and sell me several times over.
You are right to not give a shit.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 AM.