Quote:
Originally Posted by notcasesensitive
IIs the point of this game to find the most obscure possible person who possibly could be a "celebrity"? I think not. If you are looking up people you don't already know who appear on death watch lists on the internet, I think that is sort of against the spirit of the celebrity death pool. Just my opinion, but I guess my opinion sort of matters here. By including these questionable people who I then need to research and waste my mental energy on deciding whether technically they are celebrities, it makes my job running this pool less fun.
|
First, please accept my thanks for moderating this every year. It brings a weird thrill into an otherwise drab life.
Second, I apologize for treating your question as rhetorical. I feel especially guilty because it drives me CRAZY when I ask similar questions ("Hey guys, which approach is more consistent with what we're trying to accomplish here, A or B?") and I get no responses, or responses only from the people who want to change what the organization is trying to accomplish.
That said, to the extent it helps with this issue going forward next year, I have no objection to the use of celebrities whose famousness originated from crime. The purpose served by the no-death-row rule isn't to redefine "celebrity"; it's to avoid the hazard to the game of allowing picks whose death is a scheduled event, period. There is no "reward" to bad people for making them famous enough for a death pool, as I see it.
My policy preference is to expand the definition of celebrity as broadly as possible so the DP lists don't become permutations of the same 25 people. I'm guilty of adopting the best people from last year's lists, and anyone who takes a gamble by adding in new blood is making this more fun, not less (IMHO). It would be a shame if everybody's list were the nine oldest people on aretheydeadyet.com plus one person who was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer last year. The truly memorable hits here were Mindy McCready and Amy Winehouse — indisputably celebrities, yes, but we admire the spirit of gambling in spending a precious spot of 10 on something that risky.
I guess what I'm saying is that I respect your desire to make the right decision about eligibility, but as a player I'm not terribly disturbed by other people's idea of who's a celebrity. If you decided to get out of the gate keeping business, I wouldn't feel like the game had gone to shit.
