LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 218
0 members and 218 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-05-2016, 03:13 PM   #1955
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: an actual fashion post

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Underwear only enables one to get lazy with self-control. We of the commando persuasion keep the sphincters taut.

Re boxers specifically, though I used to wear them about the house casually at times, with clothes, they're basically shorts for wearing pants (or other shorts). You're already wearing shorts or pants, the function of which is to cover up in a socially acceptable, perhaps even stylish, manner. You don't need shorts for wearing pants, or shorts, any more than you need contacts for wearing glasses.
I'm always jel of men whose mommy taught them to wipe completely
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.