Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Banzhaf is a tool. he teaches a class in public interest law where the class is geared to fucking something up to "fix" a wrong. Years before a "friend" of mine attended GW, Banzhaf had sued GW, for the students because GW cancelled classes one snow day. Banzhaf sued for the pro-rata share of tution. GW settled.
guess what the fall out was? Well, there could be 4 or 5 inches of snow and DC is shut done. GW? open. There could be 2 feet of snow and you stil have to get to class through a completely stopped city.
Public interest law?
|
So does that mean that this is the correct board for this post?
Suing for the tuition is an incredibly toolish move. But the potty parity benefits everyone. Like the article said, now the men won't have to hold our packages for so long while we are in the restroom.
How many times have you had to wait for your SO because of a line in the women's room? Think about it.
On a related topic, if you (assuming you are a man) were at the mall or somewhere else by yourself with your small (say 4 yo) daugther, what would you do if she needed to use the restroom? Would you take her into the men's room where she would have to walk by and see guys peeing in urinals? Or would you send her into the women's room to use the toilet by herself and guard the door to make sure that she came out OK?
