Forums

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally posted by Not Me
Technically, it would be a bell curve, with 5 being the average person. However, most of us tend to set the average looks as at least one category below our own and that will affect the distribution. So, if you are not that cute but not ugly (in my opinion), I would put you at a 4, you will probably think of yourself as more of a 5 and perhaps on a good day a 6. Your curve will thus be skewed to have more people in the higher numbers than mine would.

A better way to assess your level of attractiveness and who you should seek out to date/marry is to assess the level of attractiveness of those members of the opposite sex who are attracted to your looks only. So this is a "who looks at you when you walk down the streets" assessment. You cannot factor personality into this, so don't take into account the people who know you and are attracted to you.

If you are a female, the best looking males of those who are attracted to you as you walk down the street are one looks category below you. You should focus your efforts on attracting men of a similar looks category as that. Don't waste time on the guys who are better looking than that because the chances are slim that they will be asking you to marry them.

If they have alot of money, you have to go 1 looks category below the best looking guys who are attracted to you when you walk down the street. The reason I say this is because guys who have alot of money want to be with women at least 2 looks categories above theirs. They think that their money entitles them to that.

Translation: I'm a 2.

TM