|
The offending photo in my old post has now been deleted and I must rely on others' descriptions of it. I gather that it involved a busty woman, some baby oil, and a dwarf giving the camera the finger. Yes?
This being the case, I conclude that I linked to a topical, non-obscene photo on a website hosted by a person who didn't appreciate the bandwidth-depleting aspect of having his photo linked, so he replaced the file with something that communicated his displeasure with subtlety and grace and gave it the same filename and path.
Please accept my assurances that the photo was not obscene when it was first posted. However, the webmaster who performed the linky-switcheroo is now my hero.
|
