This case is unfolding like one of the funniest dark political comedies of all time.
This moron just did more damage to the prosecution than Barr.
But hey, she gets her 15 minutes of fame!
And Stone’s defense counsel gets to explain why they should not be subject to a claim of insufficiency of counsel. How in the hell did she get on a jury in this case?
ETA: Here is the transcript where the foreperson allegedly says she would not allow her political views to infect her decision making, and that she did not pay much attention to the Russia investigation, both of which are contradicted by her social media:
https://www.scribd.com/document/4469...ipt-Nov-5-2019
I have not read it in detail, but offer it as a helping hand to Ty, who will want to parse this down to the most ridiculous points to argue that her selection and involvement in this trial was totally appropriate.
