LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 116
0 members and 116 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-14-2020, 07:18 PM   #398
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Putting aside for the second that I don't really care, this piece (written by a friend of mine, full disclosure) defends what the prosecutors did vis-a-vis Stone. Sebby, if you think the facts in here are wrong, you should question your sources, because Roy knows his shit.
That Sessions memo focuses on charging primarily, assuming the harshest charges deliver the harshest sentences. It grants prosecutors discretion adequate to refrain from the Credico threat enhancement. One wonders whether there was any discussion with supervisors about removing that overreaching argument. What I’ve read seems to indicate the prosecutor who signed it was actually browbeaten into keeping maximum enhancements by subordinates who worked for Mueller.

The memo is a perfect alibi here.

But your friend makes a great point, and he undoes my suspicion that the first memo was all the fault of overzealous prosecutors. It’s actually zealous prosecutors enabled by a political hack racist Atty General who is thankfully Gone.

Sessions is Satan’s ass plug in those schematics of Hell I’ve offered in past posts. And Satan eats nothing but bean burritos, ghost pepper frittatas, and black coffee.

That memo is disgusting. I seriously wish the worst of terminal illnesses on Sessions. As I always have.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 02-14-2020 at 07:21 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 AM.