LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 131
0 members and 131 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-24-2020, 11:22 AM   #432
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Re: Appellate issue?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
Dude. Stop.

What you are saying does not hold water.
The judge apparently spoke for about an hour about what Stone did, and I would wager that Sebby spent no more than twenty seconds reading a third-account before he decided that he use of the phrase "cover up" is a scandal. Contrarian!

Also, what she said last night: "judges cannot be ‘biased’ and need not be disqualified if the views they express are based on what they learned while doing the job they were appointed to do."

Bonus conclusion: "At bottom, given the absence of any factual or legal support for the motion for disqualification, the pleading appears to be nothing more than an attempt to use the Court’s docket to disseminate a statement for public consumption that has the words 'judge' and 'biased' in it."
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar

Last edited by Tyrone Slothrop; 02-24-2020 at 11:26 AM..
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM.