LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 157
0 members and 157 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-05-2020, 01:18 AM   #593
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
Maybe we should add you to the list of people who need to be Bloomberged by Liz. It's a long list.
All of the other candidates quit and endorsed Joe. And they were good little boys and girls in doing so. Bernie will be a good little boy and endorse Joe when he quits. Warren is not a boy. When she eats her peas like the other good little boys and girls who ran and endorses Joe, she will be one of the good little girls to have done so. Along with Klobuchar.

If you’ve info on Warren’s gender that renders a female characterization misplaced, please share.

Unless, of course, you subscribe to the notion that calling her a good little girl is automatically sexist. If that's a case, it's quite shocking you'd fail to note my use of "little" as well. This is clearly insensitivity to the height challenged. And as I've now called Pete and Bloomberg good little boys, don't forget misandry, and to the extent "little" may be a slight based on age, I should also be flagged for ageism.

I like Warren. I've written fawning things about her at length here. But she's going to be arm twisted, and I think she'll be promised something, and I suspect that she'll take the bargain. They all be good little soldiers in the end. Because the Establishment has Struck Back. You'll get behind Joe, dammit, or you'll be in exile.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 03-05-2020 at 09:41 AM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.