Forums

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield

Are you suggesting this judge requesting the unredacted report is proof that Barr misrepresented the report? I'd say that's a judge's opinion.

I'm saying that a federal judge saying that Barr isn't credible is proof that you were wrong when you said, don't worry, Barr won't do anything to risk his credibility. And BTW, if other people's opinion is that you aren't credible, you're not credible.

Now, I know you worship the courts and all, but judges are not infallible. Hence, they have these things called courts of appeal. Perhaps you've experience with them?

OK, why don't you explain to me how the court of appeal is going to review the trial judge's determination that Barr is not credible and that he therefor needs to review the redactions made by DOJ himself. You're predicting that DOJ will file an interlocutory appeal of the judge's order that the report be produced in camera, and in the course of that proceeding the DC Circuit is going to say that the judge was clearly erroneous in finding that Barr lacked credibility?