|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm saying that a federal judge saying that Barr isn't credible is proof that you were wrong when you said, don't worry, Barr won't do anything to risk his credibility. And BTW, if other people's opinion is that you aren't credible, you're not credible.
OK, why don't you explain to me how the court of appeal is going to review the trial judge's determination that Barr is not credible and that he therefor needs to review the redactions made by DOJ himself. You're predicting that DOJ will file an interlocutory appeal of the judge's order that the report be produced in camera, and in the course of that proceeding the DC Circuit is going to say that the judge was clearly erroneous in finding that Barr lacked credibility?
|
I see now that the Guardian and the New York Times played down what the judge actually said, which is that "Attorney General Barr distorted the findings in the Mueller Report."
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
