LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-24-2020, 02:39 PM   #865
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Tom Friedman's approach seems to depend on levels of cooperation, compliance and national leadership that seem lacking.



That would have been great, but because the federal government screwed up the testing for so long, we now don't have the resources to do that. We don't have the tests, we don't have the healthcare workers, we don't have the equipment to protect them, and we also don't have the antivirals. Why not just hypothesize a magical pony that will make the virus go away?
Agreed on both. But the point made is that the NYTimes, and particularly Friedman, who as I noted above is a lickspittle centrist of the most useless kind, are asking whether the economic cost is too high.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 AM.