Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
That's the best you got?
1. You totally ignored the packaging argument;
2. You fought the footnote like that was the whole argument, because that was the only shred of a reply you had;
3. You roped in an argument about hydroxychloroquine from days ago in a bitter little coda.
Go tell your clients all the things they can't do.
|
You are entirely an illiterate idiot. The packaging is a low-quality transmitter, as I said, because it’s porous. It’s also unlikely to be sneezed or spit upon, because of normal food safety protocols. Also, people accepting it are likely taking greater than normal protocols, including washing their hands. The packaging argument is the same as the food argument, except for heat. The people working there aren’t trying to get you infected, even if they don’t have PTO.
You falsely asserted that people not getting it via obviously low risk means implies that airborne transmission is the primary route, because you have never had any judgment about anything.
