LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 160
0 members and 160 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-18-2020, 12:09 AM   #2119
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Early days, but so many of the people who loudly explained that the New York Times should be publishing alternative views like Tom Cotton's don't seem similarly upset that Trump is abusing the classification process and the DOJ to try to keep Bolton's book from being read. It's almost like the commitment to free speech and a robust marketplace of ideas is situational or something.
If this is aimed at me, I've been slammed with shit and haven't even read much about this Bolton book. (I detest Bolton, so he's rarely on my radar.)

Put me on the record as follows:

All Bolton wants to publish should be published, without edit. If Trump wants to fight/refute it, he must argue against it.

And if he can't handle Bolton, he's a moron. From a PR perspective, all one needs to say is "Warmonger, neocon, sour grapes, next question." Trump will of course fuck it up, being incapable of repeating such a simple message.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 AM.