LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 131
0 members and 131 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-05-2020, 09:17 PM   #2305
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Chess exposes the difference between binary and shorter term thinkers versus less rule-oriented and longer term thinkers more than any other game. It favors limited thinkers.

A person anticipating possible changes to rules or being able to subvert rules runs into difficulties. The risks in chess also assume largely rational responses.

Eddie Fisher was never going to run anything.

This is why, while I love Tyler Cowen, he often comes off like a silly robot.

It also explains why the person critiquing chess is, like most of these “reaching” pieces, a moron.
Huh? I’m dumb and I admit it. Chess is for dumb people? What are you saying?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 AM.