LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 133
0 members and 133 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-07-2020, 12:03 AM   #2319
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
You are dumb. I was saucy enough to have said Eddie Fisher where I meant Bobby Fischer and you didn’t slay me for it? Shame on you.

Chess is rules-based. Rigidly rules based. It’s thinking through loads of possible small outcomes individually or as they might come together in a bigger strategy.

But it’s not really as great an indicator of broader intelligence as people assume, as most decisions in life don’t involved such limited, fixed potential moves. If there aren’t established rules, or you include the option of bending or ignoring rules, chess thinking becomes ineffective.

You can see this at work in our politics. There were rules. Gingrich threw out the rules. But a lot of people are still attempting to follow the old rules, and they seem confused by the idea that their opponents are not working within that framework.
Picasso learned to paint like a Renaissance realist before he became Picasso! Chess teaches me to think. When I walk in a court room unprepared, for me, it’s like playing chess with a 1 minute limit to move.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM.