LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 131
0 members and 131 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-14-2020, 05:39 PM   #2478
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
I'll leave to the audience to decide whether you are equally tolerant of all threats to free speech, be it a hippie on Twitter or a US Senator urging that the military suppress protests. I guess I missed the part where you told everyone that the New York Times should be giving op-ed space to the lefty critics of the Harper's letter.



I said, who is being silenced, and you say Bari Weiss? Whatever is happening with her, she is not being "silenced." She just wrote a book that some people really liked and some people really did not like. But not for the pandemic, she would have been on an international book tour this spring, something you can read about on her web site, next to her press clips. Clearly you are using "silenced" as a euphemism for something else.
The Times should give space to critics of the Harper’s Letter. I would like to see that debate.

“We argue that shaming and screaming for deplatforming is not discourse between thinking adults.”

“But power dynamics! Something something something... You're old! Racist!”

“Explain yourselves.”

“Patriarchy! Old men! You have to go! We journalists of the New Truth see through you’re using facts and logic. Those are tools of old men scared about keeping their power, like Gloria Steinem and Margaret Atwood.”

“You’re nuts.”

“Racists!”

“I think we’ll just turn the channel now. Call us when you children grow up.”
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 AM.