Forums

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

One side of the debate is: J.K. Rowling can say what she wants about trans people and sue people for libel, but the real problem is other people on the internet. And the other his, J.K. Rowling said something I didn't like, no one should read her books without adult supervision and instruction. We're one side short of a three-way tie for last.

Again you are misrepresenting me. I did not and do not support Rowling suing people to squelch their speech. I never said I did and never said I would. You're inserting that into my argument to create equivalence between my argument in favor of free expression (w/o calls for boycotts or demands that views which "trigger" hypersensitive loons be scrubbed) and Adder's ridiculous belief he has to shield his kid from Rowling's work because of some Twitter feud in which she engaged.