LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 149
0 members and 149 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-04-2020, 03:39 PM   #3123
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Nate Silver said Clinton had a 71% chance of winning, but that means he thought Trump had a 29% chance of winning. If a .290 hitter comes to the plate and strokes a single, no one is surprised.
Nate Silver bluffed a lot of people into not needing to vote or to go third party, cuz she was going to win anyway. Real Clear Politics collected the actual polls and that showed toss up. We had President Obama and Hillary in Michigan the day before the election. When Obama was running we didn't see a candidate after September cuz it was over.

But yes on %- the guy who taught me most of what I know as a lawyer taught me that:

Client: what do you think is my % chance of winning.

Hank's mentor: You have a good chance, I've explained the strength and weaknesses, but there are too many variables to guess a %. Besides, if you lose you lose 100%.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 AM.