LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 157
0 members and 157 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-08-2020, 02:41 PM   #3727
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Ah yes, the young women of color who get a lot of votes are just dumber than you. Sure.
I said they were emoting, not critically thinking. I think some of that might be intentional. That’s their appeal. That’s the appeal of many candidates in the moment. They don’t critically think either because they can’t or because they don’t have to. But either way, it’s immaterial.

He’s empathetic.
I could have a beer with her.
He knows struggle and loss.
She’s a decent person.

These are all valid reasons to vote. But they aren’t critical considerations. They’re expressive, based in feelings. This election was a rejection of harshness, of coldness, meanness.

The Squad fits into that narrative. But critical thinkers? AOC, yes.

However, as to intelligence, I think Tlaib is objectively pretty dumb. That’s based on having heard her give a speech or debate on TV. And while Omar is cunning, that’s a different thing than smart (See Trump).
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 11-08-2020 at 02:48 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 PM.