Quote:
|
"largely performative" my ass. Go ahead, evolve your argument now.
|
I wrote "largely" in the first post to which you were responding. I'm not evolving anything. You're incorrectly stating that I said it's entirely performative, which I did not. (Go back and read the words. You're wrong here.)
Quote:
|
I wasn't talking about Rogan, I was talking about the barstool conservatives.
|
I think they're the same. They're "bros," to be sneered at like "Bernie Bros." I can't speak for all of them, but I'd bet the majority of them are quite socially liberal. BarStoolSports is not a conservative brand. More libertine than anything.
Quote:
|
You're not obligated to attack 1776 at all. Say whatever it is you want to say. It's just that the things you choose to get exercised about are telling.
|
The sneaky are worth scrutinizing. Idiots aren't worth assessing. The same jaundiced eye I am applying to
1619 and progressivism generally is the same one I applied to the run up to the Iraq War and Bush's Administration generally. You're taking Slave's position in that argument here.
Quote:
|
As my friend Hank says, isn't it pretty to think so? Some bullshit gets you going.
|
Bullshit that people insist is not bullshit because they believe in the agenda behind it is the worst kind of bullshit. It's the fulcrum on which bullshit shifts from something silly, to be ignored, into something dangerous.
