LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 132
0 members and 132 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-30-2021, 12:02 PM   #4696
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: tying threads!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
90% of my calls are scheduled zooms or dial-ins, but I'll pick up an unscheduled one now or then.

I'd pick up in Sebby's situation if I weren't busy, but I'd probably wonder why he didn't schedule the damn thing.

Separate question: AITA or is it a nice, light-hearted moment if I have the associate play "Winner takes it all" as background while we're waiting for callers to assemble on a zoom. Situation is one where we're winning.
I never schedule calls where I'm paying someone. You usually don't have to. Creditors who've been ignored typically jump at the call.

It's not a long enough call for a Zoom, and definitely not something that can be done by email. "I'll get a judgment" vs. "Good luck collecting it" is a not record one wants in print. It's also hard to convey that you're not bluffing, and establish trust, in written text.

I think lots of cases wind up unnecessarily in heated litigation because people don't talk enough these days. I try to force opposing parties to meet in person early on in any large matter where there appears to be considerable acrimony. Trial by meeting. Let everyone air their claims and get an idea of what's going to happen in the case, without it being filtered through lawyers.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 AM.