LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 132
0 members and 132 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-22-2003, 12:59 PM   #2914
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Inconceivable!!

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by ME!
Dorkiness is measured by unfamiliarity with TV and movies?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Me again: Your response basically says, "no, it's measured by unfamiliarity with TV and movies and posts about TV and movies. Dumbass."

Please turn the TV down. You can't even hear yourself think.

(What? It's off? Well, then, why can't you hear yourself th. . . . Oh. You're not. OK.)
Are you serious? Did you even read the post? Why are you even arguing this? Did your wife shit in your cheerios again?

1. Adder has seen the movie.
2. Adder admitted to recognizing the character.
3. Adder most likely reads every post on this board (some of which have contained that particular quote)
4. The picture is clearly doctored.
5. The sign he is holding has no connection to an anti-war with Iraq protest.
6. ADDER ADMITTED THAT HE WAS A DORK FOR NOT PUTTING ONE THROUGH FIVE TOGETHER.

So, what conclusion do you draw? That I say he isn't cool because he's unfamiliar with TV and movies. You are projecting.

His dorkiness arises from the fact that although he HAS seen (and is therefore familiar with, dumbass) the movie and the line and the actor, he fooled himself into thinking that an obviously doctored photo of someone with a sign that is unrelated to the protest they are attending looked like an actor in a movie he has already seen.

It has nothing to do with his unfamiliarity with T.V. or movies. Read closely: He is already familiar with the movie, actor and the line. It has to do with his ability to process the information he has in his head against the information in front of him. If you can't see the difference, maybe you're too cut off from the rest of the world and should watch some more T.V.

Let's draw an analogy. You perform research on why fish-faced people draw irrational conclusions. Later, I show you an Onion article on why fish-faced people are the most rational of all hybrid species. You then ask me whether the rest of the world had access to this new information and if you could share the article with your fish-faced boss.

Afterwards, when I call you a dork, dumbass, I wouldn't be criticizing your lack of personal knowledge of the fish-faced. I would be pointing out that you had all the necessary tools at your disposal to determine that the article wasn't real. Understand?

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 PM.