Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Sebby, the report today is that Fani Willis could have indicated double the number of people she did:
An Atlanta-area special grand jury that spent months investigating alleged 2020 election interference in Georgia by Donald Trump and his allies agreed that the former president should be indicted in the case and also recommended charging one of Trump’s closest associates, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), and 37 other people — a far larger group than a prosecutor ultimately charged. WaPo
Wonder if this changes your view at all.
eta:
And now Meadows's bid to remove to federal court has been rejected, which undermines his defense. Doesn't that make Willis's decision to charge him look better? |
I read a few articles about that. My view is Willis has a template - she's done RICOs before - and she's defaulting to it. Smith could've done something similar, but I think he more wisely chose to narrow his focus. One of the two is going to try a case in the near term. And it won't be Willis.
Maybe Willis' aim is to provide proffers Smith can use? If there's coordination, that'd be pretty smart.
