Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
I'm not sure if you are a trolling sock, a twit or if your education included something experimental where they taught you different meanings for common English words. But you said "Hamas comes back over the fence and massacres the settlers. You say, this is uniquely awful! Uh, no it is isn't." To the common folk like me that is equating the two actors as being equally bad. I'm done on this because I like you and I really am bothered by what you post on the topic, year after year.
|
Buy a dictionary and learn the English language. Unlike you, many common folk can read what I wrote and understand that I'm not equating the two. Many common folk would read the times I've said I'm not equating the two to understand that I'm not equating the two, but not you.
If you're done on this topic, fine, because you're not really responding to me at all. You don't have the same problems with reading comprehension on other topics. Did you read anything that I wrote in that post after "no it isn't" where I explained what I meant? Obviously not.
eta:
When I said that wasn't uniquely awful, did you think I meant
a) What Hamas did wasn't awful
b) What Hamas did was awful, but not uniquely so
c) What Hamas did is no better or worse than other things Israel has done
Based on, you know, reading what I actually wrote, common folk understand that the right answer is not a) and not c). But you're a smart guy, what did you think?
