Forums

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I accept your gracious concession.

Redux.

First you say:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
And yet it's plainly not the same as killing a baby, even if you think it's morally equivalent.

Then I say:

Originally posted by Not Me
That depends on what you mean by "not the same." If you mean not the same legally, then you are right.

Then you say:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
It's also patently obvious that they're not the same as a matter of fact.

Then Bilmore says:

Originally posted by bilmore
Once again, you (the generic "you") assume the point in contention to make the point in contention.

Then I say:

Originally posted by Not Me
Please elaborate on how.

Then you say:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Babies are different from fetuses in several significant respects. Google it.

(bilmore: this is not an "assumption")

Then I say:

Originally posted by Not Me
How is a fetus that would be viable outside the womb different then?

BTW - Yes it is an assumption.

Then you say:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I accept your gracious concession.

Beautiful.