LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,224
0 members and 3,224 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 03:04 PM.
View Single Post
Old 12-17-2003, 11:09 AM   #15
andViolins
(Moderator) oHIo
 
andViolins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: there
Posts: 1,049
E-I-E-I-Oh my God!

Quote:
Originally posted by spookyfish The best part of the opinion follows:

"A cow is self-propelled, does not run on rails and could be used as a conveyance," the court ruled recently. "However, there is no indication in the records that this particular cow had wheels."

sf
I disagree. The best part of the story is in the newspaper article:

D. Michael Johanson, the lawyer who represented Halcyon, said uninsured-motorist insurance cannot cover animals.

"If you can't get the cow behind the wheel of a car, it's not going to work," he said.

Thus, there is hope for you and your uninsured-motorist coverage if you happen to hit Toonsis the driving cat.

aV
andViolins is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.