LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,686
0 members and 1,686 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-15-2004, 05:05 PM   #1715
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
I assume the NYC FBers are the exception to the rule

Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
TM, if that is you, I think I can kick your ass (with or without a severed arm).
Couldn't be me. I don't care enough about any of this crap to argue too long over a definition. Besides, my client is huge and their form is rarely contested. My biggest negotiating position is, "My client's policy ties my hands on this issue. But I will note it and bring it to their attention." The other side always caves, unless it's some piece of shit bank in the middle of nowhere, party to some minor blocked account agreement, where the lawyer has only had one issue blow up in his face in the last 20 years he's been practicing which makes him so wary of that issue that he can't let it go (run-on sentence supreme!). Then, it gets bounced up above our heads on both sides and I get a call from him later on saying that his client, against his wishes, is willing to live with the risk of a check's funds being misapplied by that bank to someone else's account and not discovered until 18 months after the agreement has terminated (and they still want to be indemnified for it because it was an "error made in good faith," whatever that means).

Like I said, I just don't give a shit about any of this crap.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 AM.