LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 133
0 members and 133 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-22-2004, 07:37 PM   #4587
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
Yeah, the GOP is all about states' rights in overturning RvW.

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
I probably was thinking 13th (or whichever) amendment for the badges of slavery cases. I promise to be more careful in the future. These aren't amendments that get used much in my line of work.

Although I can't cite them off the top of my head, I know that there were cases in which the interstate commerce clause was used to uphold civil rights laws. That doesn't mean that the 14th amendment wasn't also used.
At least one Supreme Court decision -- a housing discrimination case from the late 60s or early 70s whose name eludes me -- suggests that, under section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, Congress can confer standing on people to uphold the civil rights laws even though they might be deemed to lack the injury to establish a "case or controversy" under Article III.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.