LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,294
0 members and 1,294 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2004, 05:39 PM   #4757
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Yeah, the GOP is all about states' rights in overturning RvW.

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
However, it is an awful standard to base a human beings right to live upon, wouldn't you say? I mean it is one thing to use it to base someone's right to expression on, but to base whether they get to live or don't get to live on such a nebulous standard seems pretty wacky to me.
Poor Not Me. Unable to deal with a world in which critical decisions are, indeed, very difficult. And unwilling to acknowledge with most of the rest of us, on both sides of the aisle, that these are issues and decisions that must be struggled over and where, for many of us, some level of judgment and decision must be left outside of the government's hands, even in cases where we ourselves may have strong views.

This discussion yet again pushes me more toward the pro-choice, and makes me more wary of investing the state with the decision, even though I find the idea that a three month old fetus would be aborted by someone fully capable of caring for him or her attrocious, and even though I find tragic the idea that some child may be aborted because it is "imperfect" overwhelmingly tragic.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM.