LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 9,262
0 members and 9,262 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,298, Today at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2004, 09:22 PM   #4800
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
Yeah, the GOP is all about states' rights in overturning RvW.

Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
And at what point do we decide not to impose "our" judgment and to let others decide.
That would be up until the point at which the fetus' rights outweigh the mother's. You cannot really define the point at which this occurs, but you will know it when you see it. See how much better that is than anyone imposing their judgment on others?

Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I generally believe that there should be more restrictive provisions, and that the balance has been struck too late. And then the debate starts, and I find the choice of more restrictive but not aboslute is not going to be permitted.
That is exactly how our abortion laws are evolving. What is happening on the abortion front is that more and more people are being persuaded that unrestricted abortion is not a good thing. The pro-lifers will never achieve their goal of a complete prohibition on abortion in all 50 states. Probably only in 1 state at the most. But it will be more regulated.
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.