Quote:
Originally posted by NotFromHere
OMG you're a closet prude.
Come on, it's not like she dropped her pants or took her entire top off. He just ripped the right boob part off - it was mostly covered and my god miles away. How many boob commercials were there anyway?
Seriously, how IS it different from what Lil Kim did?
|
The prude remark is so stupid. Do you understand everything you read? I said I would be pissed off about the stunt, not offended by the tit. The point is that Janet Jackson knows that there is a difference, even if it can't be completely justified with logic (it's a "I know it when I see it" thing), between a bare boob and the boob commercials, and not just the level of bareness, but the way it was bared.
And if Janet weren't aware of that difference, she wouldn't have planned the "tantalizing" or "shocking" (or however they hyped it)finale to her act.
And I don't see what purpose comparing her conduct to Lil Kim's serves in this context. Is Lil Kim going to present the award to Luther Vandross instead?
