Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
ghts and obligations.
So when those of you who try to argue that historical/traditional reasons somehow can be used to justify allowing gay marriage, you conveniently leave out that many societies/religions have historically/traditionally allowed plural marriage.
|
who's been arguing that?
If you're justifying marriage as species propogation, surely you realize you can save a lot of money by banning the impotent and infertile too.
But you've yet to answer my initial question-answer: how is the equal protection argument insufficient to distinguish polygamy?
