LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,341
0 members and 2,341 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-07-2004, 01:50 AM   #867
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I really don't understand why you think the fact that Loving involved a criminal statute was so important.
Because I think if the statute were not criminal, the only basis for striking it down would have been fundamental rights/due process. I think that the court alluded to that in what the court wrote in the EP part of the opinion.

If there had been a VA law that simply said, marriage is allowed only between members of the same race (but no criminal penalties involved), I think the Warren court would have reached the same result, but just under a substantive due process argument.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
You can pluck out of the decision language that refers to the criminal aspects of it
true.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
but subsequent courts and commentators have not understood it as limited in that fashion.
cite please.
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.