LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 790
0 members and 790 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, Today at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-07-2004, 01:18 AM   #872
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,076
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
Gender and sexual orientation are two different things. If a law prohibits same sex marriage for both sexes, it is not a classification based on gender, but rather, based on sexual orientation. Traditional marriage laws bar both males and females from marrying members of the same sex and they can only marry members of the opposite sex. That is gender neutral. in the sense that both sexes are restricted to marrying members of the opposite sex.
You can see it that way if you like, but that's not the argument Burger and I are making. Try your argument, replacing gender with race:
  • Traditional marriage laws bar both balcks and whites from marrying members of the opposite race and they can only marry members of the same race. That is race neutral. In the sense that both races are restricted to marrying members of the same race.

Bingo! Loving!
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 PM.