Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I like that two churches told the woman she is not welcome. I am assuming that the woman didn't actually attend either of these churches, and that the churches were kind of preemptively banning her.
I swear, I would only ever buy or use a sex toy for novelty value and not for any kind of sensual purpose.
So, why does it seem to be OK for me to order stuff over the internet that is explicitly marketed as sex toys for sex, not novelty value? Anyone? Or can those purveyors be prosecuted, and only permitted to sell like lingerie or whatever, kinda like internet wine places can only sell non-alcoholic stuff like chocolate or glasses to certain states?
|
I haven't been able to figure out how to do the search in Westlaw under a dummy client code without having the search scrutinized, so I'm still wondering where this bullshit novelty thing came from. It's certainly not in the relevant statute, and I've seen judges say that marital aides are OK. I wonder if volunteering my time on this case would count towards my hours under the Texas Supreme Court's Equal Access to Justice initiative.
Again, if this case doesn't have a satisfactory* outcome, I'm running for the legislature with the sole aim of overturning the statute. And I probably live in one of the better districts to get into office on that platform.
*Satisfactory meaning the statute is overturned. 
