LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 183
0 members and 183 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-13-2004, 11:06 AM   #1752
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Bonds

Quote:
Originally posted by Aloha Mr. Learned Hand
It's the latter for me. I mean, look at the guy compared to a decade ago...

Yep. Until Bonds takes drug tests proving he's clean--And not one at his convenience, so he can get clean--we'll assume a certain level of guilt. What does the indictment add? We already knew the guy was suspect.

Although I would guess that when Bonds is proven to have been on 'roids, we'll see a level of outrage similar to what we've been seeing for Rose. People knew he bet on baseball, but his admission put it front and center in their face, so they got really pissed and now think he shouldn't be in the hall.

FWIW, assuming Bonds used 'roids, which would explain perhaps half of his homeruns the last few years, I say no hall for him, even if he "breaks" aaron's record.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 PM.