Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
It's going to go to the jury as "what do YOU think about this?", "Would this make you change your investment outlook on MSL shares?" They can do this because they are amongst the kind of people whom MS's obstructionism would have affected. Don't need an expert to opine on that.
|
I don't disagree but I was just wondering if that is in fact the law.
The reason I am so curious about this is because everyone is saying that this now basically makes it impossible for the prosecution to prove their case. If I were on a jury, I would say, yeah, it would be important to me if I owned Martha Stewart stock. So I don't see how keeping the experts out now makes it impossible for the prosecution to make their case.
