LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,922
1 members and 1,921 guests
Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-15-2004, 05:43 PM   #1505
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
 
Shape Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me

I think that the possibility that bigamy will at least be de-criminalized is high unless we get a constitutional amendment defining marriage as one man and one woman given that the arguments used for gay marriage can be used to support polygamy and there is no good way to argue for one without also arguing for the other.
We have read on these boards many ways you could argue for one without arguing for the other. If polygamy and incest are truly the concern, why not press for a constitutional amendment banning them instead of homosexual marriage? Wouldn't your polygamy/incest arguments still be valid? How would polygamy/incest be prevented by a constitutional amendment banning homosexual marriage?
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
Shape Shifter is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.