Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Fringe, I was trying to show SAM a problem with a government run system if it were extended to the whole country. I was not attacking the Oregon system, which, I'm sure is a very fine system indeed.
As to whether I do/do not read the entirety of posts, I'm afraid the question has been raised that it is somewhat irrelavent. I apparently often do not understand that which is written.
|
OK, but since SAM has said he isn't calling for a single-payor system, and RT and I have discussed what the Oregon proposal involved, what say you to that?
I do have to say I was expecting you just to ignore the whole thing since you were kinda sorta wrong in that you were using an example wrong, but you replied, and I kinda respect that. Kudos.
