LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 924
0 members and 924 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-19-2004, 04:37 PM   #1796
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
wisconsin

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Why not regulate what the royalty is on lasik?
Because glasses and contact lenses are adequate substitutes.

Quote:
Why not regulate what Lemuelson makes on bar code readers?
Why not always ask new questions instead of answering any of them?

Quote:
how much should the gov't let GM charge for its new airbag systems?
You would have to have been in a coma for the last 30 years to think that GM has a monopoly.

Quote:
What you're arguing then isn't really providing gov't ensured health care, you're arguing to pull the plug on patents for pharm. or at a minimum control how the patents are used. That will certainly kill incentive in a business that is already dealing with very tight margins.
I'm talking about regulating the industry to try to ensure that more people can afford more drugs.

Neither you nor sgtclub wants to explain this magical link between pharma profits and R&D, but my question for you is this: If R&D is such a wonderful thing, why not spend government money to encourage it?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 AM.