Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Read it, and cogitate about the reference to the "incidents" of marriage in the second sentence. And if you think that sentence is unclear, ask yourself why someone drafting an amendment to the Constitution would purposefully make it ambiguous.
|
I'm a little rusty on my Roberts', but the question will be probably be answered when someone proposes a "friendly" amendment to clarify the ambiguity.
Unless they want civil unions to be a poison pill, which is a dangerous strategem considering how the gender discrimination language wound up in Title VII as enacted.
